Unless you were
living on the moon this past week, you know that Washington
policymakers finally reached a so-called "fiscal cliff" deal that
avoids a sudden return to tax rates that are now more than a decade old. But for some reason, news outlets have been a
bit stingy about telling us exactly what's in the American Taxpayer Relief Act
of 2012.
The good news is
that our lawmakers are creeping closer to reality about how to define "the
rich;" rather than $200,000 (single taxpayers) or $250,000 in adjusted
gross income (joint returns), as specified in many prior proposals, "the
rich" are now defined as making more than $400,000 (single) or $450,000
(joint). For taxpayers whose income falls
below those thresholds, the temporary Bush-era tax cuts have (for the first
time) been made permanent, which means that for most taxpayers, the marginal
tax rates will remain the same this year as they have been for the past
two. However, taxpayers who fit this
new definition of "the rich" will experience a new 39.6% upper tax
bracket. They will also be required to
pay taxes on capital gains and dividends at a 20% tax rate. (The 15% rate still applies to taxpayers
below the thresholds.)
In addition, the
Taxpayer Relief Act borrows something from the Clinton era tax
code: itemized deductions and the personal exemption will once again begin
phasing out for individuals with more than $250,000 in adjusted gross income,
or couples with more than $300,000 AGI.
At $372,501 (single) or $422,501 (joint) of adjusted gross income,
personal exemptions are phased out in their entirety.
The tax bill also
makes permanent the current $5 million estate and gift tax exemptions ($10
million for couples), but raises the tax rate for money transferred to heirs
above that amount from 35% to 40%. And
it offers a permanent fix to the perennial alternative minimum tax problem by
inflation-indexing the threshold (currently $78,750 for joint filers; $50,600
for individuals) at which people have to calculate their AMT, exempting all but
about 5 million taxpayers from this chore now and in the future.
Also eliminated:
the two percentage point reduction in the Social Security payroll tax--a
stimulus measure enacted in 2010, which is likely to be the biggest impact of
the legislation on most taxpayers. The
payroll tax rises from 4.2% last year to 6.2% this year.
Finally, the new
tax law makes $24 billion in federal spending cuts, while giving Congress two
additional months to decide what to do about $109 billion of automatic spending
cuts that were scheduled to begin taking effect at the start of this year.
You can expect
those two additional months to be spent in partisan wrangling over where,
exactly, federal expenses should be cut, and news outlets have been repeating over
and over the fact that March 1 also happens to be the next time that Congress
has to vote to raise the debt ceiling.
We don't know whether that next debate will spill over into tax rates
once again, but we will be paying attention and will keep you posted.
No comments:
Post a Comment